This is a syntax review, not a live DNS lookup
The tool checks the text you paste for common structural problems. It does not prove that the record is published, that included SPF hosts resolve, or that mail is aligned correctly.
Review pasted SPF and DMARC records for common structural mistakes before a website or DNS migration.
Enter your site details and calculate.
This free utility is designed for migration planning. It turns a few operational inputs into a structured result so you can identify what should be checked before a production change. It does not connect to your server, registrar, DNS provider or WordPress database, so it cannot replace a real technical audit.
The tool checks the text you paste for common structural problems. It does not prove that the record is published, that included SPF hosts resolve, or that mail is aligned correctly.
Your website host, transactional mail provider, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, CRM and other senders may all affect SPF design. Copy the exact mechanisms from those providers.
A DMARC policy is effective only when legitimate mail can authenticate and align. Move gradually from monitoring to enforcement after reviewing reports.
DKIM keys and selectors come from the sending platform. If email stays with the same provider during a website migration, those records usually should not be changed.
No. It runs locally in the browser and only evaluates the values you enter. It does not log in to WordPress, connect to DNS, move files or modify hosting.
Use it as a starting checklist. Add the site-specific dependencies discovered during the source audit, including custom plugins, server rules, cron jobs, email, APIs, payment gateways and any third-party services.
Manual planning is appropriate when the site generates revenue, has active customer data, cannot tolerate downtime, uses custom server configuration, has a large database or depends on integrations outside WordPress.
The useful part of a planning tool is not the number by itself. It is understanding which assumptions produced the result, which production conditions can change it, and what should be checked before you act. Use this tool as part of a wider migration or infrastructure review rather than as an automatic go/no-go decision.
A domain can carry website routing, mail delivery, verification records, subdomains, third-party SaaS records and security policies. Review the full zone before changing nameservers or replacing records.
Recursive resolvers and client caches do not all update at one exact moment. Lower TTL before a planned cutover when possible, then keep the old origin available long enough to absorb straggling traffic.
MX, SPF, DKIM and DMARC should be checked independently of the website. A migration can appear successful in the browser while business email is silently misrouted or authentication begins failing.
Not necessarily. TTL influences caching, but resolver behavior and previously cached answers vary.
Yes if the new DNS zone does not reproduce the required MX and authentication records.
Usually for a reasonable overlap period, especially while DNS propagation and cached traffic settle.